Amazon t3.medium

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAmazon t3.medium  (all builds)
MotherboardAmazon
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171016
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 21 '21 at 00:40
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8259CL
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.9% Above average
Memory 100
1-Core 61
2-Core 65.9
55% 75.7 Pts
4-Core 78.5
8-Core 40.6
9% 59.5 Pts
64-Core 66.1
4% 66.1 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 54GB
50GB free
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 15 115 119 84 109 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.7% Very poor
Read 182
Write 73.4
Mixed 170
SusWrite 75.1
28% 125 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 4.9
19% 5.4 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 292%
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 86GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 18 129 124 94 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
65% Good
Read 142
Write 156
Mixed 147
SusWrite 82.5
98% 132 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 3
660% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 65%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
17% Very poor
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 2.5
9% 3.23 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 1.9
6% 1.97 GB/s
Latency 34.2
117% 34.2 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 1 1 0 0" 1280 720
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $116
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $87
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $373
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback