ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 23255CG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	3.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 23255CG (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 23255CG
Memory	0.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120911
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 31 '15 at 11:25
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	39%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3520M 19,660 User benchmarks, average bench 53% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 32.1 2-Core 54.3 20% 43.2 Pts	4-Core 70.8 8-Core 79.1 10% 74.9 Pts	64-Core 81 5% 81 Pts
Poor: 38% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 21FA) 1.8GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 9.18.10.3359 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.72% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 5.54 Parallax 3 3% 4.25 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 2.47 Splatting 8.13 4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.72% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132 14,258 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 114GB free (System drive) Firmware: LE1i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 18451179509769 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 3033 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 353 (B7) Unknown 100 100 2 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 353 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 248975 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 69 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 248975 (F2) Unknown 100 100 576448 (F9) Unknown 100 100 6861	44% Average	Read 396 Write 164 Mixed 245 59% 268 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 23 4K Mixed 12.4 49% 16.4 MB/s	DQ Read 48.7 DQ Write 95.6 DQ Mixed 33.9 37% 59.4 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 88%
Ricoh SD Disk Device 2GB 247 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 2GB free Firmware: 01 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 21.9 Write 18 Mixed 19.9 15% 19.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.85 4K Write 0.05 4K Mixed 0.05 167% 1.32 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 12%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback