Asus VM65N

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive78% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VM65N  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK VM65N-K
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '21 at 21:24
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
1151p, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 70.1
1-Core 95.5
2-Core 169
64% 112 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 251
34% 256 Pts
64-Core 264
16% 264 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 930M
Asus(1043 86B8) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8476
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
8.16% Terrible
Lighting 11
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 9.5
9% 9.87 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 7.5
7% 8.07 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.16%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SBAT256G1002 256GB
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2317002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 306 313 303 319 315 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
78% Very good
Read 468
Write 309
Mixed 225
SusWrite 309
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 89.5
4K Mixed 14.3
105% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 84.8
106% 184 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 78%
Great: 80%
Corsair UFD 8GB
3GB free, PID 0a60
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 11 11 10 11 11 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
7.26% Terrible
Read 22.1
Write 6.5
Mixed 5
SusWrite 10.6
12% 11 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.26%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
36.4% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 10.1
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 11
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VM65N Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VM65N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback