Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME B250M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B250M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory55.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171211
Uptime8.1 Days
Run DateSep 25 '21 at 15:19
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$179
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 64.4
1-Core 80
2-Core 161
58% 102 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 402
46% 361 Pts
64-Core 443
27% 443 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 61%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.4% Above average
Lighting 55.7
Reflection 59.8
Parallax 62.2
45% 59.2 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 67.7
Splatting 60.2
60% 76 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 259 260 256 241 251 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 340
Write 277
Mixed 298
SusWrite 256
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 83.9
4K Mixed 37.8
142% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 217
195% 298 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 126%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
198GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 95 96 97 95 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 76.2
Write 80.8
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 94.5
109% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.4
163% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
62.9% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 21.8
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 11.2
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 21.5" 1280 720 VSCB330 VA2265 SERIES
Typical PRIME B250M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,668 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B250M-PLUS - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback