Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200703
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 30 '21 at 05:44
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 160
2-Core 320
103% 191 Pts
4-Core 611
8-Core 929
95% 770 Pts
64-Core 1,202
74% 1,202 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 103%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3725 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 122
Parallax 139
113% 133 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 136
Splatting 113
115% 145 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 111%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$87
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,117
Write 1,207
Mixed 567
283% 1,297 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 58
242% 96.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,047
DQ Write 1,120
DQ Mixed 684
625% 950 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Toshiba THNSNJ512GCSU 512GB
320GB free
Firmware: JURA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 403 405 411 415 413 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 467
Mixed 455
SusWrite 408
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 97.5
4K Mixed 46.3
152% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 339
255% 340 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
1.5TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 287 156 154 155 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 205
Mixed 366
SusWrite 216
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 57.7
198% 72.5 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 337
260% 355 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 111%
Great: 128%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$55
759GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 26 24 19 20 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 44
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 40.6
103% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 28
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 37
85% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 100%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 60 34" 1280 720 ACR078B XZ342CK
Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 545 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $817
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback