Today's hottest deals

Intel Eaglelake

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel Eaglelake  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090710
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 02 '21 at 05:23
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3220-$99
Socket 423, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
49.1% Average
Memory 74.6
1-Core 34.5
2-Core 68.9
40% 59.3 Pts
4-Core 139
8-Core 138
18% 138 Pts
64-Core 138
9% 138 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6770
AMD(1002 2543) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.3001.0
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Lighting 15.2
Reflection 17
Parallax 14.2
12% 15.5 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 9.5
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
848GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.00C06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 67 87 67 95 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 94.8
Write 85.3
Mixed 78
SusWrite 76.3
62% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 62%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
6GB free, PID 0121
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 8.1 7.8 7.9 6.8 6.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 18.6
Write 7.7
SusWrite 7.4
12% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
20.8% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 6
18% 6.43 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 91.1
44% 91.1 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 25: 2R 3G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
25% 19% 59 54 32 60 31.5" 1280 720 ONN0000 onn. TV
Typical Eaglelake Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: Intel Eaglelake

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback