Medion ERAZER X7859 MD63050

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 63% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Medion ERAZER X7859 MD63050 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION PA70EXGM
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181026
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 04 '21 at 15:55
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	6%
CPU Throttled	63%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	41.8% Average	Memory 47.7 1-Core 49.5 2-Core 66.4 35% 54.5 Pts	4-Core 192 8-Core 423 36% 308 Pts	64-Core 555 34% 555 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Clevo(1558 67C4) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	31.5% Below average	Lighting 30 Reflection 30 Parallax 53 24% 37.7 fps	MRender 60 Gravity 49.4 Splatting 56.4 45% 55.3 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 256GB 92 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 353 300 124 105 195 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Read 377 Write 325 Mixed 329 SusWrite 236 71% 317 MB/s	4K Read 12.1 4K Write 40.1 4K Mixed 10 52% 20.7 MB/s	DQ Read 103 DQ Write 234 DQ Mixed 31.3 63% 123 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 98%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 346GB free Firmware: AM0P1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 104 104 104 104 102 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Read 96 Write 96.4 Mixed 34 SusWrite 103 60% 82.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GB 33,430 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	43% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 13.4 44% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 15.3 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 170 24% 170 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ERAZER X7859 MD63050 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

System: Medion ERAZER X7859 MD63050

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	6x

SSD
760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel $33Bench 190%, 20,095 samples	4x
Sata III 256GBIntensoBench 78%, 92 samples	1x

RAM
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $33

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16