Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory	5.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Oct 07 '21 at 10:36
Run Duration	262 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H 57,853 User benchmarks, average bench 53% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	35.3% Below average	Memory 40.5 1-Core 39.4 2-Core 71.3 30% 50.4 Pts	4-Core 163 8-Core 299 28% 231 Pts	64-Core 300 19% 300 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile) 92,838 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Asus(1043 109F) ≥ 4GB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.4% Poor	Lighting 30 Reflection 29.7 Parallax 36.5 24% 32.1 fps	MRender 35.4 Gravity 35.9 Splatting 38.4 30% 36.6 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ramsta R900 M.2 NVMe SSD 512GB 121 User benchmarks, average bench 189% 290GB free (System drive) Firmware: RI23V0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 739 398 169 176 191 215 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 1,135 Write 821 Mixed 730 SusWrite 315 167% 750 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 55.4 4K Mixed 14.6 84% 31.4 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 257 DQ Mixed 296 227% 310 MB/s
Poor: 103% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 269%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 698GB free Firmware: SDM4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 108 114 118 118 117 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	58% Above average	Read 87 Write 114 Mixed 56.4 SusWrite 114 68% 92.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.6 150% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN Kingston 12GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 3200, 2400 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	MC Read 18.1 MC Write 8.6 MC Mixed 15.5 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 9.6 26% 9.03 GB/s	Latency 200 20% 200 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 68%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	3	0	120	15.5"	1920 1080	NCP0036

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,815 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

CPU
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	1,836x
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	979x

GPU
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,360x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	946x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	508x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	1,156x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	406x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	380x

RAM
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	587x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	377x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	135x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16