Asus GL702VMK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus GL702VMK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL702VMK
Memory20.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161201
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateAug 17 '17 at 16:38
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 118
2-Core 223
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 589
61% 491 Pts
64-Core 584
36% 584 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1760) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 385.28
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
51.2% Above average
Lighting 62.2
Reflection 70.4
Parallax 55.8
51% 62.8 fps
MRender 68.1
Gravity 58.1
Splatting 65.2
52% 63.8 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 500GB
328GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41000WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.6% Very good
Read 500
Write 193
Mixed 364
78% 352 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 24.8
92% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 62.5
106% 208 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 119%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
467GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3V0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 108
Write 106
Mixed 107
81% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.21
80% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CRC Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
68.3% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 21.6
68% 24 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 23.1
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL702VMK Builds (Compare 422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: Asus GL702VMK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback