Asrock N68-GS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock N68-GS (all builds)
Memory	0.7 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090827
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 13 '21 at 21:25
Run Duration	266 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	44%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X3 425 1,367 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	Memory 49.2 1-Core 38.1 2-Core 58.6 32% 48.6 Pts	4-Core 80.9 8-Core 90.3 11% 85.6 Pts	64-Core 97.4 6% 97.4 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0000 0000) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.58% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 0.3 Parallax 0.4 0% 0.4 fps	MRender 1.3 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.4 1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.58% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Fastdisk 064GB 63GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 10 47 44 52 56 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 104 Write 10.5 SusWrite 35 36% 50 MB/s	4K Read 7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 382% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 37%
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30 16,754 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 32GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 37 40 39 39 47 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	26% Poor	Read 50.1 Write 49.7 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 40.2 33% 44.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 41%
Samsung HM321HI 320GB-$40 12,451 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 219GB free Firmware: 2AJ1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 71 72 71 69 71 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	23.1% Poor	Read 10.9 Write 37.7 Mixed 24.6 SusWrite 69.7 26% 35.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.3 50% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 50%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 12,078 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 573GB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 5.1 5.1 5.7 7.4 8.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	4.6% Terrible	Read 15.9 Write 6 Mixed 7 SusWrite 6.1 10% 8.75 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.1 14% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 4.6% Great: 52%
EAGET F90 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 10GB free, PID 0917 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 10 12 11 10 11 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	6.63% Terrible	Read 6.7 Write 11.4 Mixed 12.7 SusWrite 11.1 15% 10.5 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 65% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.63% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	MC Read 3.5 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 3.6 10% 3.6 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 2.8 8% 2.77 GB/s	Latency 164 24% 164 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406

Asrock N68-GS

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)