Monster ABRA A5 V16.4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics43.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V16.4  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V16.4
Memory9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190302
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 18 '21 at 16:25
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 85.4
1-Core 104
2-Core 243
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 586
63% 500 Pts
64-Core 604
37% 604 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 81%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 8560) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5720
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.6% Average
Lighting 56.8
Reflection 62.6
Parallax 50.4
46% 56.6 fps
MRender 40.9
Gravity 50.3
Splatting 48.1
38% 46.4 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 95 98 124 140 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 151
Write 164
Mixed 68
SusWrite 101
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
213% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 859B CT8G4SFRA266.C8FE 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
66.9% Good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 17.9
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 26.4
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V16.4 Builds (Compare 201 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V16.4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $55
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback