Asus UX410UAR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive67% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus UX410UAR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX410UAR
Memory14 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '21 at 13:44
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 31%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 67.2
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 183
64% 115 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 393
47% 361 Pts
64-Core 367
23% 367 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 63%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Asus(1043 15A0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
6.29% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 7.7
6% 7 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 10.7
7% 8.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.29%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W256G1002 256GB
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6103002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 192 192 199 164 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
67% Good
Read 402
Write 357
Mixed 272
SusWrite 187
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 70.3
4K Mixed 19.9
86% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 255
204% 288 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 859B CT16G4SFD824A.M16FRS 20GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.1% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 18.1
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 19.1
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UX410UAR Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus UX410UAR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback