ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-Z97X-UD3H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	52.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z97X-UD3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z97X-UD3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150918
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Nov 04 '15 at 22:12
Run Duration	98 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50 229,359 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 114 2-Core 229 78% 172 Pts	4-Core 363 8-Core 413 51% 388 Pts	64-Core 414 26% 414 Pts
Poor: 53% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Asus(1043 0470) ≥ 4GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	Lighting 65 Reflection 59.1 Parallax 82.2 53% 68.7 fps	MRender 54 Gravity 56.5 Splatting 75.4 52% 62 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ssd2sc24 0G1SA754D117-459 240GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: N0815B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 102 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 201 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 27 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 31 100 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 42430 (C4) Reallocation count 98 98 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 102 (E7) Temperature 100 100 31 (E9) Unknown 0 0 0 (EA) Unknown 0 0 10 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1691 (F2) Unknown 0 0 899	97.3% Outstanding	Read 524 Write 308 Mixed 387 90% 406 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 36.3 148% 57.3 MB/s	DQ Read 278 DQ Write 291 DQ Mixed 70 112% 213 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 97%
Seagate ST31000340NS 1TB-$95 7,250 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 863GB free Firmware: SN06 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 81 63 164266628 (03) Spinup time 98 88 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 271 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (07) Seek error rate 62 58 146082128513 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 18602 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 99 25 (0C) Power cycle count 100 37 134 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 97 30065295370 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 41 2989819101213 (C2) HDA temperature 29 59 51539607581 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 28 17 164266628 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 189 1364	49.7% Average	Read 88.2 Write 84.6 Mixed 85.3 65% 86.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 1.63 4K Mixed 0.49 115% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical GA-Z97X-UD3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-UD3H-CF

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	450x
Core i5-4690KIntel $50Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	199x
Core i7-4790Intel $132Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	142x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	128x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	90x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	73x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	32x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	29x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	32x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 4x8GBCrucialBench 57%, 8,984 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $648

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback