HP ProDesk 600 G4 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive312% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G4 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83EE
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210416
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 24 '21 at 03:15
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500-$139
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 79.8
1-Core 132
2-Core 260
86% 157 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 744
79% 629 Pts
64-Core 760
47% 760 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
HP(103C 83EE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
3.77% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 8.4
6% 8.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.77%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2033 1851 1725 1624 1934 1707 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
312% Outstanding
Read 1,562
Write 1,026
Mixed 905
SusWrite 1,813
298% 1,326 MB/s
4K Read 58.1
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 73.2
249% 85.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1597
DQ Write 1,182
DQ Mixed 1,336
1,013% 1372 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 312%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9B85] CT16G4DFRA266.C16FP 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 35.5
MC Mixed 29.4
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 38.1
SC Mixed 27.6
80% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G4 SFF Builds (Compare 528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G4 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback