Lenovo 10AEA09FUK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 10AEA09FUK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200611
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 24 '21 at 18:08
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 81
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 186
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 370
45% 347 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Legend(17AA 309B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4474
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.32% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 9
Parallax 6.8
3% 6.47 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
4% 5.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.32%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 245 280 288 265 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 468
Write 437
Mixed 266
SusWrite 234
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 37.8
126% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 156
145% 225 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 108%
Maximus-128G 128GB
31GB free
Firmware: 8A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 148 150 150 151 152 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 468
Write 143
Mixed 179
SusWrite 150
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 55.2
4K Mixed 10.8
79% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 63.6
69% 114 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 0702 1GX64B160K HYN 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
59.6% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 18
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 19.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10AEA09FUK Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10AEA09FUK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $39
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback