Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2620M 16,111 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Memory 86.5 1-Core 72 2-Core 143 61% 101 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 210 28% 211 Pts	64-Core 211 13% 211 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 21CF) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.97% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.7 Parallax 1.6 2% 2.17 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 2.7 Splatting 2.8 2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.97% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GB 6,630 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 123GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT02L5Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 89 85 89 80 86 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	49% Average	Read 362 Write 138 Mixed 133 SusWrite 85.8 39% 180 MB/s	4K Read 14.9 4K Write 39.6 4K Mixed 17 65% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 317 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 55.3 81% 158 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 0B13 S939A2SGS-ITR 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.2% Above average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 15.6 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 16 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 70.9 56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-2620MIntelBench 52%, 16,111 samples	9x
Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples	1x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	10x

SSD
CS900 480GBPNY $42Bench 79%, 17,946 samples	2x
WDS200T2G0A-00JH30 2TBWDCBench 48%, 758 samples	2x
MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 61%, 6,630 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G4M1 8GBSamsungBench 47%, 54 samples	4x
ACR256X64D3S16C11G 1x2GBKingstonBench 19%, 125 samples	1x
SODIM DDR3 1333 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 45%, 901 samples	1x

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $42