Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 28 '21 at 17:53
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD EPYC 7571 32-Core 4 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	55.4% Above average	Memory 63.6 1-Core 72.3 2-Core 127 52% 87.7 Pts	4-Core 255 8-Core 393 40% 324 Pts	64-Core 384 24% 384 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 510 2,450 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 0967) 2GB CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.06% Terrible	Lighting 3.4 Reflection 4.9 Parallax 4.2 3% 4.17 fps	MRender 4.7 Gravity 4.5 Splatting 4.2 4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.06% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 107GB 129 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 421 414 431 428 451 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x16GB 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB DIMM RAM Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	MC Read 28.4 MC Write 26.3 MC Mixed 26.7 78% 27.1 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 25.9 SC Mixed 20.3 60% 21.1 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 161%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 127%

UFO

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples	5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	4x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples	3x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16