Today's hottest deals

Asus G74Sx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive79.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus G74Sx  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G74Sx
Memory7.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110427
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateOct 29 '21 at 11:51
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$230
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 71.5
2-Core 132
58% 94.9 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 346
37% 295 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M
Asus(1043 204A) 3GB
CLim: 775 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.73
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
7.52% Terrible
Lighting 8.7
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 7.9
7% 9.6 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 9.9
Splatting 9.3
8% 10.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.52%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 2TB-$147
748GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 399 397 395 402 400 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 456
Write 396
Mixed 372
SusWrite 399
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 25.3
81% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 245
185% 249 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 124%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 21.9
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 25.5
32% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
40.3% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 11.7
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 12.6
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G74Sx Builds (Compare 493 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G74Sx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback