Today's hottest deals

Pegatron H36FF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemPegatron H36FF  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON H36FF
Memory0.3 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100908
Uptime58.8 Days
Run DateNov 01 '21 at 12:39
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Memory 58.5
1-Core 32.9
2-Core 58.9
34% 50.1 Pts
4-Core 82.6
8-Core 82.7
11% 82.6 Pts
64-Core 81
5% 81 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 320M
Device(1B0A 209B) 1GB
Driver: Ver. 21.21.13.4201
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.35% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 0.4
1% 1.67 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 3.1
2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.35%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03070103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 58 58 91 90 75 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32% Below average
Read 208
Write 35.5
Mixed 134
SusWrite 76.5
25% 113 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 23.7
4K Mixed 16.2
44% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 67.9
DQ Mixed 108
81% 109 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2S1G64CB88C5N-CG 830B M2N2G64CB8HC5N-CG 3GB
1067, 1067 MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.5% Poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 8.8
21% 7.47 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.13 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H36FF Builds (Compare 70 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Pegatron H36FF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback