Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 15-db0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15-db0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84AD
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '21 at 14:51
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 83%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Memory 39.2
1-Core 49.2
2-Core 79.4
33% 55.9 Pts
4-Core 81.8
8-Core 106
12% 94.2 Pts
64-Core 109
7% 109 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 84AD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.93% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.8 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.93%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
885GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 44 43 40 44 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
30% Below average
Read 61.8
Write 34.8
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 42.1
36% 48.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 30%
Great: 79%
General UDisk 4GB
4GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 12 13 14 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
8.04% Terrible
Read 19.7
Write 9.3
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 13.5
15% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
35% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.04%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:0x9B05 CB4GS2400.C8GT Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GB
1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.2% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 7.9
24% 8.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 206
19% 206 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15-db0xxx Builds (Compare 1,058 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-db0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback