Today's hottest deals

Siemens SIMATIC IPC547E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSiemens SIMATIC IPC547E  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3236-S1
Memory8.8 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600x900x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181015
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 05 '21 at 21:16
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 170
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 352
48% 360 Pts
64-Core 365
23% 365 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000
Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 353.62
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Lighting 13.7
Reflection 18.1
Parallax 15.8
11% 15.9 fps
MRender 20.9
Gravity 13.8
Splatting 14.9
13% 16.5 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC1LE04
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 252
Write 168
Mixed 163
43% 194 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 23.6
82% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 63.8
DQ Mixed 24.2
38% 73.5 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
428GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 166 167 168 168 168 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
90% Excellent
Read 148
Write 101
Mixed 84.2
SusWrite 166
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 90%
Great: 112%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
129GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 95 99 90 97 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 123
Write 81.5
Mixed 20.3
SusWrite 93.5
58% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
72% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 103%
USB Flash Disk 4GB
3GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
8.54% Terrible
Read 20.2
Write 10.7
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 10.9
17% 13.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
78% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.54%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/4G Micron 8KTF25664AZ-1G6K1 Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 14GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.2% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 17.8
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 18.9
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SIMATIC IPC547E Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Siemens SIMATIC IPC547E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $197
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback