MSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C08
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '21 at 03:37
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 85.4
1-Core 134
2-Core 265
89% 162 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 517
69% 517 Pts
64-Core 521
32% 521 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 85E7) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.88% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 5
4% 5.23 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.88%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ESA3SMH2ISN2BT120GB 120GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0611A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 375 370 367 373 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 439
Write 351
Mixed 323
SusWrite 327
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 19.7
128% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 88.1
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 27.2
71% 143 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 10.4
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 12.8
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08) Builds (Compare 3,911 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback