Machinist X79 Z9-D7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics58.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardMachinist X79 Z9-D7  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '21 at 08:31
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 74.9
1-Core 72.3
2-Core 144
58% 96.9 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 561
53% 440 Pts
64-Core 823
51% 823 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58.7% Above average
Lighting 76
Reflection 74.8
Parallax 74.3
62% 75 fps
MRender 61.8
Gravity 73.2
Splatting 58.8
52% 64.6 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 62%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-256L9S-11 2.5 7mm 256GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HC8110B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 366 370 385 387 332 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 438
Write 376
Mixed 282
SusWrite 369
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 25.4
88% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 201
188% 291 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70CH0- 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.4% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 9.7
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 90.5
44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Z9-D7 Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Machinist X79 Z9-D7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $198
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback