Today's hottest deals

Medion M14L-256

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion M14L-256  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION SF40IL6
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210108
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateNov 16 '21 at 20:07
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 67.1
1-Core 112
2-Core 203
71% 127 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 232
36% 261 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Device(1E39 A030) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9466
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
4.89% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 7.2
6% 6.13 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 10
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.89%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S11-256G-PHISON-SSD-JGS 256GB
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMP1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 144 145 121 76 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 370
Write 174
Mixed 271
SusWrite 118
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 23.8
4K Mixed 15.5
55% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 188
160% 235 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD4AS008G-H2666GSC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.5% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 11.3
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 9.6
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M14L-256 Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Medion M14L-256

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback