HC HCAR357-MI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHC HCAR357-MI  (all builds)
MotherboardHC HCAR357-MI
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210728
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 01 '21 at 09:01
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 66
1-Core 114
2-Core 192
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 494
52% 417 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 21.6.2
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
9.33% Terrible
Lighting 11.7
Reflection 9
Parallax 18.6
10% 13.1 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 11
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.33%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Shiji 256GB M.2-NVMe 256GB
210GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0520A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 876 969 957 1041 1073 839 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1584
Write 1,083
Mixed 909
SusWrite 959
253% 1,134 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 26.2
157% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 616
DQ Mixed 318
286% 422 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 189%
Great: 189%
Mass Storage Device 134GB
124GB free, PID 1212
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 6.5 6.5 11 11 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3.2
Write 1.7
SusWrite 9
6% 4.63 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.8% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 13.1
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 15.3
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HCAR357-MI Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HC HCAR357-MI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback