Today's hottest deals

Biostar Hi-Fi A85W

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics7.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar Hi-Fi A85W  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130418
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 04 '21 at 05:54
Run Duration342 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800B APU (2012 D.Tr)
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Memory 68
1-Core 57.6
2-Core 58.8
42% 61.5 Pts
4-Core 69.3
8-Core 65.1
9% 67.2 Pts
64-Core 49.6
3% 49.6 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7750
Gigabyte(1458 2551) 1GB
CLim: 880 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
7.96% Terrible
Lighting 9
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 14.5
7% 13 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 9.8
Splatting 11
9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.96%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate 600 240GB-$215
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C675
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 240
Write 88.8
Mixed 190
38% 173 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 23.7
4K Mixed 14.4
47% 16.1 MB/s
DQ Read 25.6
DQ Write 71.2
DQ Mixed 32.9
30% 43.2 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 103%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB
771GB free
Firmware: JP4OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 84 83 93 89 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
62% Good
Read 125
Write 123
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 90.5
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 62%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$67
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 84 83 93 89 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
62% Good
Read 125
Write 115
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 90.6
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62%
Great: 84%
WD WD2500JD-00HBB0 250GB-$83
81GB free
Firmware: 08.05J08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 35 34 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Read 38.8
Write 37.3
Mixed 28
SusWrite 34.5
26% 34.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 33%
Hitachi HTS547564A9E384 640GB
23GB free
Firmware: JEDOA50A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 36 38 32 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 63.4
Write 31.9
Mixed 27.6
SusWrite 36.7
29% 39.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL RMR5040ED58E9W1600 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.07% Terrible
MC Read 1.3
MC Write 1.5
MC Mixed 3.2
6% 2 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.63 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Hi-Fi A85W Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar Hi-Fi A85W

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback