Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 20% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4120 2,420 User benchmarks, average bench 33% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	21.1% Poor	Memory 26.7 1-Core 27.3 2-Core 19.8 17% 24.6 Pts	4-Core 92.8 8-Core 81.4 12% 87.1 Pts	64-Core 82.4 5% 82.4 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 39FE) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7870 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.46% Terrible	Lighting 0.7 Reflection 0.8 Parallax 0.8 1% 0.77 fps	MRender 1.1 Gravity 0 Splatting 0 0% 0.37 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.46% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Umis RPJTJ128MEE1MWX 128GB 883 User benchmarks, average bench 123% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0C0628 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 170 158 134 154 145 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	47.6% Average	Read 444 Write 346 Mixed 365 SusWrite 151 73% 326 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 12.5 4K Mixed 15.6 53% 15.1 MB/s	DQ Read 36.8 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 43.8 49% 78.2 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 177%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4x2GB 218 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	16.7% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 8.5 18% 6.43 GB/s	SC Read 1 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 2.7 6% 2.27 GB/s	Latency 275 14% 275 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 74%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Jet ski

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4120IntelBench 33%, 2,420 samples	93x
Pentium Silver N5030IntelBench 35%, 2,697 samples	27x
Celeron N4100IntelBench 33%, 6,492 samples	14x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	105x
UHD Graphics 605IntelBench 2%, 14,651 samples	27x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 2%, 8 samples	3x

SSD
RPJTJ128MEE1MWX 128GBUmisBench 123%, 883 samples	61x
MZALQ128HBHQ-000L2 128GBSamsungBench 110%, 3,299 samples	40x
CL1-4D128 128GBSsstcBench 83%, 486 samples	12x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16