Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus EX-A320M-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '21 at 04:37
Run Duration300 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 74
1-Core 108
2-Core 218
74% 134 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 440
59% 441 Pts
64-Core 433
27% 433 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 876B) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.30.14
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Lighting 15.9
Reflection 16
Parallax 22.2
13% 18 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 17.1
Splatting 14.2
12% 14.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OSC 120GB 120GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200619
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 28 33 1.6 2.7 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 475
Write 402
Mixed 340
SusWrite 61.8
71% 320 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 12.1
89% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 16.8
62% 131 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 81%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
931GB free
Firmware: 233010WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1312 366 364 373 368 368 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 1,534
Write 1,820
Mixed 1,379
SusWrite 525
296% 1,315 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 81.2
4K Mixed 50.5
163% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 994
DQ Write 419
DQ Mixed 626
485% 680 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 176%
Great: 276%
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB
217GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 73 72 73 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 71.7
Write 71.7
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 72.9
48% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 31.1
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 25.2
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 92.4
43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EX-A320M-GAMING Builds (Compare 1,229 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $236
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback