Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80E1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 80E1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 4B2
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140826
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '21 at 18:08
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-6010 APU R2 Graphics
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
27% Poor
Memory 47.8
1-Core 20.4
2-Core 38.3
25% 35.5 Pts
4-Core 38.9
8-Core 40.2
5% 39.6 Pts
64-Core 39.9
2% 39.9 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 27%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3801) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.302.1601.1001
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.21% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 1.7
1% 1.87 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 2
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.21%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
2.5 SATA SSD 256GB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HAFEB1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 169 96 156 292 176 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
42% Average
Read 304
Write 98.8
Mixed 151
SusWrite 176
40% 183 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 25.1
4K Mixed 13.2
58% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 34.3
DQ Write 36
DQ Mixed 31
24% 33.8 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 5.3
13% 4.47 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.13 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80E1 Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80E1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback