Compaq-presario KQ365AA-ABE SR5439ES

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCompaq-presario KQ365AA-ABE SR5439ES  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Benicia
Memory1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '21 at 01:24
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200-$49
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
40.2% Average
Memory 61.6
1-Core 34.7
2-Core 67.3
36% 54.5 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 133
15% 120 Pts
64-Core 137
8% 137 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 3643) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.3% Poor
Lighting 30.1
Reflection 31.4
Parallax 38.3
24% 33.3 fps
MRender 40.9
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 31.7
30% 36.9 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 320GB-$59
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GM3OA57A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 18 28 25 30 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 7.3
Mixed 27.1
SusWrite 25.6
17% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
75% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
512, 512, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 5.1
16% 5.63 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 3.7
13% 4.47 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KQ365AA-ABE SR5439ES Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Compaq-presario KQ365AA-ABE SR5439ES

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $234
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback