| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (0th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 100 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
| Graphics | 20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 49.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds) |
| Motherboard | |
| Memory | 5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150206 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 02 '17 at 09:15 |
| Run Duration | 135 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X5660
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
28.9%
Poor
|
32% 58.4 Pts
|
29% 252 Pts
|
26% 426 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 280X-$500
XFX(1682 3210) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.8.2
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
20.2%
Poor
|
15% 17.7 fps
|
30% 35.8 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Qemu HARDDISK 913GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+ Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
|
49.6%
Average
|
98% 436 MB/s
|
17% 5.6 MB/s
|
4% 8.33 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QEMU 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
|
20%
Very poor
|
22% 7.53 GB/s
|
11% 3.93 GB/s
|
15% 260 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 97 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples | 5x |
| Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples | 4x |
| Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 8x |
| RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples | 7x |
| RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $499 |