Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4120 2,420 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	26.6% Poor	Memory 29.7 1-Core 41.9 2-Core 83.7 29% 51.8 Pts	4-Core 137 8-Core 129 18% 133 Pts	64-Core 168 10% 168 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.58% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 2.1 Parallax 1.6 1% 1.8 fps	MRender 0.8 Gravity 1.6 Splatting 4 2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.58% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD256GBS420 256GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 194GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 387 395 397 401 226 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	71.9% Very good	Read 438 Write 360 Mixed 324 SusWrite 360 83% 370 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 48 4K Mixed 19.5 77% 28.3 MB/s	DQ Read 139 DQ Write 268 DQ Mixed 38.1 76% 148 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	25.1% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 11.3 28% 9.97 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 2.7 9% 3.07 GB/s	Latency 256 16% 256 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4120IntelBench 33%, 2,420 samples	89x
Celeron N5095IntelBench 43%, 1,699 samples	49x
Celeron N5095AIntelBench 40%, 431 samples	35x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	161x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 4,536 samples	84x
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples	37x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	145x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	28x
DDR4 NB 16G 2666 1x16GBUnknownBench 33%, 35 samples	23x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16