ADD TO PC
BUILD

Arbor ARES-1980

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	87.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Arbor ARES-1980 (all builds)
Motherboard	Default Default string
Memory	60.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20211001
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 15 '21 at 14:17
Run Duration	324 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-1185G7E 25 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Memory 73.5 1-Core 99.6 2-Core 200 70% 124 Pts	4-Core 376 8-Core 485 55% 430 Pts	64-Core 481 30% 481 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe 144,774 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9126 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 29.4 Reflection 30.3 Parallax 31.5 24% 30.4 fps	Splatting 23.6 24% 23.6 fps
Poor: 8% Great: 20%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
2.5" SATA SSD 3TG6-P 4TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 3.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: A20506 SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 425 418 366 420 421 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	87.5% Excellent	Read 461 Write 407 Mixed 226 SusWrite 411 84% 376 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 67.8 4K Mixed 29 115% 41.5 MB/s	DQ Read 261 DQ Write 142 DQ Mixed 97.5 100% 167 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 87%
WDS400T3X0C-00SJG0 4TB 121 User benchmarks, average bench 296% 3.5TB free Firmware: 114000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 2255 2132 595 545 39 522 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	261% Outstanding	Read 1,960 Write 2,272 Mixed 1,826 SusWrite 1,015 398% 1,768 MB/s	4K Read 44.7 4K Write 191 4K Mixed 73.8 264% 103 MB/s	DQ Read 934 DQ Write 810 DQ Mixed 865 650% 870 MB/s
Poor: 194% ↑ This bench: 261% Great: 367%
WD Elements 25A2 500GB 1,804 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 69GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 77 76 76 77 76 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	31.6% Below average	Read 77.2 Write 76.7 Mixed 47.7 SusWrite 76 93% 69.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
InnoDisk Corporation M4SE-BGS2OC0M-A 2x31.5GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 2 slots used 63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	94.2% Outstanding	MC Read 36.8 MC Write 41 MC Mixed 31.2 104% 36.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 27.2 SC Mixed 15.2 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 93.5 43% 93.5 ns
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback