Asus G750JX

Performance Results

Gaming 15%
Desktop 71%
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus G750JX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G750JX
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131118
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 17 '21 at 18:16
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 92.4
2-Core 147
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 421
45% 358 Pts
64-Core 468
29% 468 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770M
Asus(1043 213E) 3GB
CLim: 862 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 425.46
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 19.4
Parallax 24.5
15% 20.9 fps
MRender 22.9
Gravity 24.7
Splatting 0.2
11% 15.9 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 2TB-$150
562GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 427 434 431 432 434 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 427
Mixed 380
SusWrite 429
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 34.1
113% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 295
237% 334 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 125%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$60
597GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 56 105 71 43 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 117
Write 107
Mixed 73.9
SusWrite 68.3
68% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G9P1 Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 16KTF1G64HZ-1G9P1 Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
57.3% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 17
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 19.2
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G750JX Builds (Compare 382 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 15%
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G750JX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $77
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback