HP Pavilion Desktop TP01-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics13.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Desktop TP01-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8643
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210917
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 23 '21 at 19:28
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 78
1-Core 146
2-Core 288
92% 171 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 1,042
93% 788 Pts
64-Core 1,444
89% 1,444 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
HP(103C 841E) 2GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.50.02.10
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Lighting 15.5
Reflection 22.3
Parallax 20.8
13% 19.5 fps
MRender 15.4
Gravity 16
Splatting 18.9
14% 16.8 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 209 204 204 198 190 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1,086
Write 275
Mixed 618
SusWrite 234
122% 553 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 66.6
232% 85 MB/s
DQ Read 570
DQ Write 744
DQ Mixed 469
406% 594 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 159%
Great: 164%
WDC WDBNCE2500PNC 250GB
88GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 91 91 87 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 354
Write 94.8
Mixed 292
SusWrite 90
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 30.4
101% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 165
135% 192 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 107%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
708GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 105 105 108 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 371
Write 329
Mixed 333
SusWrite 106
64% 284 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 90.7
4K Mixed 58.1
190% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 204
154% 207 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 133%
WDC WDBNCE2500PNC 250GB
143GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 96 96 98 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 324
Write 264
Mixed 180
SusWrite 96.6
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 30.4
101% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 198
151% 203 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 107%
WDC WDBNCE2500PNC 250GB
47GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 96 96 95 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 354
Write 98.6
Mixed 210
SusWrite 96.2
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 30.5
101% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 200
152% 204 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 107%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
2TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 144 147 146 147 146 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 146
Write 109
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 145
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 96%
Flash USB Disk 2GB
2GB free, PID 3a04
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4.7 4.2 4.6 4.7 4.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
6.27% Terrible
Read 22.5
Write 4.5
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 4.4
8% 8.28 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
32% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.27%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD M4U08S681LJJJ43-12 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.1% Very good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 29.5
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 25.4
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Desktop TP01-0xxx Builds (Compare 624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Desktop TP01-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback