Today's hottest deals

Intel X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardIntel X79  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '21 at 11:24
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 73.5
2-Core 142
64% 103 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 432
41% 341 Pts
64-Core 542
34% 542 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.1% Below average
Lighting 37.9
Reflection 41.9
Parallax 39.7
31% 39.8 fps
MRender 38.7
Gravity 39.7
Splatting 28.5
28% 35.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2c08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 198 207 206 175 72 MB/s
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.7% Average
Read 203
Write 204
Mixed 203
SusWrite 177
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 33.4
4K Mixed 22.5
76% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 176
130% 167 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 88%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$34
370GB free
Firmware: A750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 110 107 114 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 150
Write 156
Mixed 37
SusWrite 111
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
120% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5170FH0- M393B5170FH0- M393B5170FH0- M393B5170FH0- 12GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.8% Above average
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 20.6
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.7
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 2,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback