Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	6.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	42.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-5350U 860 User benchmarks, average bench 52% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	35.2% Below average	Memory 50.9 1-Core 65.1 2-Core 100 43% 72 Pts	4-Core 107 8-Core 184 18% 145 Pts	64-Core 182 11% 182 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 6000 (Mobile) 5,021 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Apple(106B 011B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	6.2% Terrible	Lighting 8 Reflection 3.3 Parallax 9.2 6% 6.83 fps	MRender 6.2 Gravity 7 Splatting 7.1 6% 6.77 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.2% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 24 0GB SSD 19 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 198GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 286 279 249 283 273 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	42.8% Average	Read 252 Write 308 Mixed 295 SusWrite 268 64% 281 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 15.3 4K Mixed 9.4 43% 13.3 MB/s	DQ Read 62.4 DQ Write 93.1 DQ Mixed 134 86% 96.5 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0x483943434E4E4E424A544D4C41522D4E5544 2x4GB 246 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	44.3% Average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 13.3 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 14.3 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 157 25% 157 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 86%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 6000 (Mobile)IntelBench 6%, 5,021 samples	270x

SSD
SM0128G PCIe 121GBAppleBench 143%, 564 samples	67x
SM0256G PCIe 251GBAppleBench 149%, 1,022 samples	56x
SM0512G PCIe 500GBAppleBench 162%, 1,474 samples	16x

RAM
0x483943434E4E4E424C54424C41522D4E5444 2x4GBUnknownBench 52%, 604 samples	70x
0x 2x4GBUnknownBench 48%, 498 samples	65x
0x483943434E4E4E424A544D4C41522D4E5544 2x4GBUnknownBench 60%, 246 samples	39x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16