ADD TO PC
BUILD

Foxconn H61MXV/H67MXV

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Foxconn H61MXV/H67MXV (all builds)
Memory	3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20110228
Uptime	6 Days
Run Date	Dec 31 '21 at 15:19
Run Duration	212 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2310-$90 15,623 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	69.1% Good	Memory 85 1-Core 81 2-Core 161 65% 109 Pts	4-Core 310 8-Core 306 41% 308 Pts	64-Core 310 19% 310 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 25,436 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Device(0000 0000) 2GB CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	5.17% Terrible	Lighting 6.2 Reflection 6.8 Parallax 1.8 5% 4.93 fps	MRender 5.5 Gravity 7.3 Splatting 6.8 5% 6.53 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.17% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WD40EZAZ-00SF3B0 4TB 19,163 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 110 113 116 113 117 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Read 122 Write 108 Mixed 60.8 SusWrite 114 23% 101 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 9.5 4K Mixed 1.1 14% 5.3 MB/s	DQ Read 0.6 DQ Write 11.6 DQ Mixed 0.9 2% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 39%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80 31,610 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 199GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.AAK SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 63 49 56 45 60 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	34.7% Below average	Read 68 Write 66.7 Mixed 40.7 SusWrite 52.5 42% 57 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 43%
Seagate Desktop 500GB 1,637 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 102GB free, PID 3300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 31.4 Write 23.6 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 19 31% 24.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 21%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 1,977 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 368GB free, PID a207 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 31.3 Write 23.1 Mixed 14.2 SusWrite 19 28% 21.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 73,650 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	51% Above average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 16.4 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 15.5 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 71.9 56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical H61MXV/H67MXV Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn H61MXV/H67MXV

CPU
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	19x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	19x
Core i3-2120Intel $32Bench 51%, 77,810 samples	18x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	31x
GeForce GT 620NvidiaBench 2%, 17,163 samples	6x
Radeon HD 6770AMDBench 10%, 16,639 samples	5x

SSD
AS350 128GBApacerBench 65%, 2,222 samples	30x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
X300 256GBSanDisk $99Bench 79%, 2,341 samples	3x

RAM
M378B5173DB0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 7,467 samples	22x
M378B5773CH0-CH9 1x2GBSamsungBench 23%, 488 samples	8x
JM1333KLN-2G 2x2GBTranscendBench 42%, 507 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235	Nvidia RTX 4070 $499	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback