Today's hottest deals

Sony SVF15415CDW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSony SVF15415CDW  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130729
Uptime5 Days
Run DateJan 01 '22 at 19:05
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5745M APU
N/A, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
44.1% Average
Memory 67.7
1-Core 49.4
2-Core 86.5
44% 67.9 Pts
4-Core 121
8-Core 125
16% 123 Pts
64-Core 127
8% 127 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8610G
Sony(104D 90C1) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
2.99% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 5.4
3% 4.57 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 5
Splatting 4.8
3% 4.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.99%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vc-500 480G 512GB
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0703A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 266 272 263 278 279 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.9% Good
Read 373
Write 274
Mixed 285
SusWrite 268
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 19.6
92% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 45.1
65% 120 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 84%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
648GB free
Firmware: JA0OA5G0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 2.4 2.9 3.1 2.2 1.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 65.8
Write 3.2
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 2.5
14% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.6% Very poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.77 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 7.1
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SVF15415CDW Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Sony SVF15415CDW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback