Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics25.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime8.2 Days
Run DateJan 04 '22 at 12:53
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$184
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 92.7
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 191
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 735
65% 553 Pts
64-Core 1,000
62% 1,000 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
XFX(1682 9275) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.5% Poor
Lighting 32.7
Reflection 36
Parallax 43.4
27% 37.4 fps
MRender 30.3
Gravity 31.7
Splatting 24.7
23% 28.9 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$88
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 576 250 251 253 253 254 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,858
Write 1,208
Mixed 479
SusWrite 306
212% 963 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 55.7
197% 74 MB/s
DQ Read 751
DQ Write 577
DQ Mixed 524
430% 617 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 184%
Great: 236%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$55
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 119 120 121 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 123
Write 119
Mixed 83
SusWrite 120
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 83%
Jmicron H/W RAID0 40TB
8.5TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 24 25 24 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.4% Very poor
Read 35.8
Write 23
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 24.5
20% 27 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
87% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 99%
FUJITSU MHY2160BH 160GB
42GB free, PID 0c15
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 31 32 32 32 32 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 33.5
Write 30.1
Mixed 23.6
SusWrite 32
40% 29.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GEIL CL16-16-16 D4-3000 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 47.4
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 37
119% 41.5 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 20.9
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 62.6
64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 107%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback