Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop E510MAB_E510MA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK E510MAB
Memory	3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210723
Uptime	12.8 Days
Run Date	Jan 09 '22 at 05:08
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4020 5,047 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	34.2% Below average	Memory 48.6 1-Core 59 2-Core 121 43% 76.1 Pts	4-Core 115 8-Core 120 16% 118 Pts	64-Core 119 7% 119 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 29%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1DD2) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.83% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 2.3 2% 1.97 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 2 Splatting 3.5 2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.83% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K44BM0-CTD 1x8GB 85 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.4% Poor	MC Read 6.3 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 8.1 21% 7.37 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 4.6 12% 4.23 GB/s	Latency 166 24% 166 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4020IntelBench 21%, 5,047 samples	31x
Pentium Silver N5030IntelBench 35%, 2,697 samples	24x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	31x
UHD Graphics 605IntelBench 2%, 14,651 samples	24x

SSD
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	47x
OM8PCP3512F-AB1 512GBKingstonBench 128%, 190 samples	5x
THNSN5256GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshibaBench 109%, 23,829 samples	1x

RAM
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 1x8GBMicron_Bench 13%, 30 samples	16x
M471A1K44BM0-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 32%, 85 samples	15x
4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 1x4GBMicron_Bench 15%, 420 samples	10x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16