TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Alaska A_M_I_

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAlaska A_M_I_  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210317
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 11 '22 at 21:04
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4125
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Memory 34.3
1-Core 59.5
2-Core 118
38% 70.7 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 238
31% 234 Pts
64-Core 229
14% 229 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑
This bench: 37.3%
 Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9079
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
2.26% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 2.5
2% 2.7 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 1% ↑
This bench: 2.26%
 Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac S535N4/128GYN 128GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0330A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 355 373 379 371 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 431
Write 364
Mixed 342
SusWrite 317
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 69.7
4K Mixed 18.9
95% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 36.1
86% 173 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 75.6%
 Great: 76%
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB
5GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 4.4 4.5 4.1 3.8 3.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 17.9
Write 13.7
Mixed 10.4
SusWrite 4
14% 11.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 2.3
163% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑
This bench: 10.7%
 Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x3GB
4 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
28% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 12.9
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 3.8
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 230
17% 230 ns
Poor: 13% ↑
This bench: 28%
 Great: 28%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical A_M_I_ Builds (Compare 598 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Alaska A_M_I_

CPU
Celeron J4125IntelBench 35%, 2,594 samples289x
N100IntelBench 50%, 2,388 samples67x
Core i7-10810UIntelBench 70%, 612 samples62x
GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples300x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 6,852 samples77x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 3%, 2,359 samples67x
SSD
N900-512 512GBBench 75%, 91 samples31x
256GB 256GBKimtigoBench 114%, 291 samples24x
FPT310M4SSD128G 128GBBench 72%, 20 samples24x
RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples208x
123456789012345678 4x3GBABCDBench 23%, 488 samples67x
4x4GBMicronBench 53%, 324 samples46x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback