Gigabyte GA-MA785GT-UD3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MA785GT-UD3H  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '22 at 08:23
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 630
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
47.4% Average
Memory 70.3
1-Core 40.5
2-Core 83.6
42% 64.8 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 155
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4200
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
1.02% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.6
1% 1.07 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 0.4
0% 0.6 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.02%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 300GB
257GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 38 34 38 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 77.7
Write 118
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 37.5
56% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 166%
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 700GB
652GB free
Firmware: 1.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 38 30 36 30 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.9% Poor
Read 55.6
Write 137
Mixed 43.3
SusWrite 34.3
50% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.3
68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
29.8% Poor
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 10.9
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 8.3
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MA785GT-UD3H Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA785GT-UD3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback