Today's hottest deals

Thomson N17V3C8WH512

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemThomson N17V3C8WH512  (all builds)
MotherboardNF NF
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210827
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 12 '22 at 21:05
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4020
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Memory 22.5
1-Core 46
2-Core 62.8
25% 43.8 Pts
4-Core 70
8-Core 81.3
10% 75.7 Pts
64-Core 91.1
6% 91.1 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 29%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1191
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.78% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 0.9
1% 1.03 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.78%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GN512 512GB
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0330A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 67 88 108 89 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 395
Write 324
Mixed 319
SusWrite 123
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 34.8
4K Mixed 16.3
63% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 55.7
DQ Mixed 36.2
41% 72.8 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 95%
Mass Storage Device 64GB
43GB free, PID 1212
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 12 11 10 10 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 15.7
Write 11.2
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 10.8
17% 12.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.5
114% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.9% Very poor
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.63 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 3.1
9% 3.03 GB/s
Latency 303
13% 303 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N17V3C8WH512 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Thomson N17V3C8WH512

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback