Acer Aspire A514-54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.81% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A514-54  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Lily_TL
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211103
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJan 13 '22 at 12:59
Run Duration299 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 69.3
1-Core 125
2-Core 132
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 480
48% 391 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Acer(1025 1468) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1003
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
7.81% Terrible
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 19.2
8% 14.2 fps
MRender 11.8
Gravity 15.9
Splatting 1
7% 9.57 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.81%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme IM2P33F8ABR1-256GB 256GB
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1103B0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 460 438 431 288 395 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 1,400
Write 1,017
Mixed 559
SusWrite 385
186% 840 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 20.2
120% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 410
DQ Mixed 340
266% 363 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 131%
Great: 177%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD4S3200J4G22-B 4JQA-0622AC 8GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
50.9% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.1
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 13.3
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A514-54 Builds (Compare 1,429 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A514-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback