Emaxx EMX-IH310LTX-ICAFE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemEmaxx EMX-IH310LTX-ICAFE  (all builds)
MotherboardEMAXX EMX-IH310LTX-ICAFE
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180828
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJan 16 '22 at 10:13
Run Duration277 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 111
2-Core 222
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 396
54% 403 Pts
64-Core 409
25% 409 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.9% Poor
Lighting 37.3
Reflection 41.6
Parallax 39.7
30% 39.5 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 42.2
Splatting 28.2
29% 36.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 240G 240GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.2.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 164 124 100 104 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
64% Good
Read 362
Write 239
Mixed 241
SusWrite 127
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 26.3
117% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 97.4
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 132
105% 143 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64%
Great: 102%
Jmicron Tech 1TB
614GB free
Firmware: 3202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 328 282 36 44 79 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.8% Below average
Read 255
Write 276
Mixed 227
SusWrite 162
52% 230 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 28.3
4K Mixed 0.9
34% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 30.3
DQ Mixed 0.9
21% 53.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
87GB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 112 108 113 112 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 117
Write 63.2
Mixed 75
SusWrite 111
68% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
106GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 128 127 127 129 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 96.3
Write 73.5
Mixed 62.9
SusWrite 127
66% 90 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 112%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
55GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 64 63 63 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 73
Write 75
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 65.1
50% 68 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AD41G08SKU24 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.7% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 22.3
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 22.8
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EMX-IH310LTX-ICAFE Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Emaxx EMX-IH310LTX-ICAFE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $161
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback