Acer Nitro AN515-54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-54  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Octavia_CFS
Memory1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200916
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '22 at 11:48
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 122
2-Core 225
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 645
67% 541 Pts
64-Core 541
34% 541 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1331) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.66% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 12.3
Parallax 7.2
5% 8.57 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 10.5
7% 8.07 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.66%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 223 203 194 194 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 844
Write 804
Mixed 730
SusWrite 239
147% 654 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 38.4
128% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 703
DQ Write 557
DQ Mixed 476
398% 579 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 116%
Great: 136%
Tcsunbow X3 1TB
380GB free
Firmware: S0509A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 139 67 75 76 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 488
Write 380
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 120
55% 251 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 7.8
44% 11.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8HJ-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
42.7% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 11.3
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 13.7
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-54 Builds (Compare 11,971 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback