Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '22 at 16:09
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 105
2-Core 206
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 398
53% 398 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Asus(1043 8411) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.59% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 0.5
2% 1.67 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 2
2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.59%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 256GB
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 423 310 375 363 319 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 270
Write 434
Mixed 301
SusWrite 337
76% 336 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 94.1
4K Mixed 10.5
129% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 13.9
46% 102 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 166%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
1GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6.1 5.3 4.8 7.6 4.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 29.4
Write 5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 5.7
11% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
75% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6DFR8A-PB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.6% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 18.6
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 20.3
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 4,512 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback