Today's hottest deals

Sony VPCEH2D0E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSony VPCEH2D0E  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory3.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '22 at 20:07
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium B950
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 81.5
1-Core 53.2
2-Core 108
51% 80.8 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 107
14% 108 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Sony(104D 908B) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
1.09% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 1
1% 1.07 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.09%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 140 133 139 131 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 309
Write 161
Mixed 208
SusWrite 150
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 34.2
4K Mixed 20.8
78% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 55.8
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 157
120% 156 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 85%
SKYMEDI USB Drive 4GB
2GB free, PID 8628
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4.2 4 4.3 4.3 4.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
3.68% Terrible
Read 13.7
Write 2.7
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.1
7% 6.17 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.68%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
29% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.9
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.3
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VPCEH2D0E Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Sony VPCEH2D0E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $30
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback