Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '22 at 03:27
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 80.3
1-Core 122
2-Core 244
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 709
74% 597 Pts
64-Core 695
43% 695 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 1792 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31% Below average
Lighting 39
Reflection 53
Parallax 40.9
32% 44.3 fps
MRender 39.9
Gravity 41.3
Splatting 29.5
29% 36.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ngff 2242 256GB SSD
126GB free
Firmware: T0707B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 421 420 429 440 441 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 398
Mixed 374
SusWrite 431
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 89.6
4K Mixed 28.5
127% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 43.4
89% 175 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 94%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
306GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 28 20 25 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 21.8
Write 22.2
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 24
15% 20.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
58% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 79%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
444GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 128 127 128 127 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 142
Write 137
Mixed 97.1
SusWrite 127
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ G.SKILL F4-2133C15-4GVR DDR4 3000 2OZ G.SKILL F4-2133C15-4GVR 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
73.8% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 23.6
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 22.8
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $422
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback